In global e-commerce logistics, consistent delivery times are crucial for customer satisfaction and inventory planning. CNFANS Shipping provides the tools and data to move beyond estimates and make decisions based on proven performance. This guide explains how to evaluate which shipping routes consistently meet their deadlines using historical data.
The Power of Historical Performance Data
Rather than relying solely on carrier-provided estimates, CNFANS aggregates historical delivery data for every major route. This real-world performance tracking is the foundation for accurate comparison.
- Actual vs. Promised Transit Time:
- Route-Specific Analytics:
- Carrier Performance per Lane:
Step-by-Step: Comparing Delivery Times on CNFANS
Step 1: Access the Shipping Analytics Dashboard
Navigate to the ‘Analytics’‘Shipment History’origin regiondestination region(s)
Step 2: Define Your Evaluation Timeframe
Select a relevant historical period (e.g., last quarter, last 6 months). A longer timeframe provides more statistical significance and helps account for seasonal variations like holidays or peak sales periods.
Step 3: Analyze Key Consistency Metrics
CNFANS dashboards typically display several critical metrics for each route. Focus on these to compare reliability:
| Metric | What It Measures | Why It Matters for Consistency |
|---|---|---|
| On-Time Delivery Rate (%) | The percentage of shipments delivered on or before the promised date. | The primary indicator of reliability. A 95% rate is significantly more consistent than an 80% rate. |
| Average Delay (Days) | The mean number of days late for shipments that missed the deadline. | Shows the severity of delays when they occur. A shorter average delay is preferable. |
| Transit Time Range (Min-Max Days) | The fastest and slowest recorded delivery times for the selected route. | Reveals predictability. A narrow range (e.g., 12-15 days) is more consistent than a wide one (e.g., 8-20 days). |
Step 4: Compare Routes and Carriers Side-by-Side
Use comparison charts to view multiple destination routes from a single origin. You may discover that:
- Route A to Northern EuropeSouthern Europe
- For the same destination, Carrier XCarrier Y
Step 5: Identify Trends and Make Data-Driven Decisions
Look for trends in the data. Has performance on a key route improved or declined over the last three months? Use these insights to:
- Choose the most reliable route/carrier
- Set accurate customer expectations
- Flag underperforming routes
Conclusion: Consistency Over Speed
While raw speed is often the initial focus, predictable and consistent delivery times are more valuable for operational efficiency and customer trust. By systematically using CNFANS's historical shipment data to compare regional delivery performance, you can move from guessing to knowing. This allows you to optimize your shipping strategy, reduce unexpected delays, and ultimately build a more reliable supply chain.
Log in to your CNFANS dashboard today and start comparing your key routes.