Home > Maintaining Yearly QC Reports for Seller Performance Analysis on KAKOBUY

Maintaining Yearly QC Reports for Seller Performance Analysis on KAKOBUY

2025-12-23

Effective vendor evaluation on the KAKOBUY platform relies on consistent, long-term tracking of quality and compliance data. This guide outlines the systematic process for logging inspection outcomes and refund ratios over multiple years to build a robust, actionable seller performance analysis.

1. The Importance of Longitudinal QC Data

A single year's data provides a snapshot, but multi-year trending

  • Identify vendors with sustained high qualitychronic issues.
  • Differentiate between minor seasonal fluctuations and serious degradation in performance.
  • Make objective renewal, partnership expansion, or termination decisions.
  • Provide suppliers with concrete, historical feedback for their improvement plans.

2. Core Metrics to Track Annually

Build your yearly report around two pillars of quantitative data:

Metric Category Key Data Points Calculation/Logging Method
Inspection Outcomes (QC) Pass Rate, Major/Minor Defect Rates, AQL Results, Critical Non-Conformances Log results per shipment/batch, then calculate annual averages and trends.
Post-Sale Refund Ratios Refund Rate (%), Refund Reason Breakdown (Quality vs. Non-Quality), Customer Complaint Volumes Aggregate platform sales and refund data on a per-vendor, per-year basis.

3. Structuring Your Multi-Year Log

Use a standardized template, digital or within a platform like KAKOBUY's vendor management module, to ensure consistency.

Example Log Structure for Vendor "ABC Supplier":

Year: 2023
- QC Pass Rate: 94.7% (Trend: ▲ 2.1% from 2022)
- Avg. Defect Rate: 1.8%
- Primary Defect: Packaging damage (45% of defects)
- Refund Ratio: 3.2%
- Top Refund Reason: "Item not as described" (60%)
- Vendor Rating: **Good**

Year: 2022
- QC Pass Rate: 92.6%
- Avg. Defect Rate: 2.3%
- Primary Defect: Component failure (38% of defects)
- Refund Ratio: 4.1%
- Top Refund Reason: "Defective item" (70%)
- Vendor Rating: **Satisfactory**

4. Analysis and Actionable Evaluation

At the end of each year, compare the data against previous years and predefined benchmarks.

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Improving Trajectory:preferred status
  • Stable Performance:
  • Declining Trajectory:Corrective Action Request (CAR)

5. Best Practices for Maintenance

  • Automate Data Collection:
  • Centralize Documentation:
  • Schedule Annual Reviews:
  • Update Benchmarks:

By systematically maintaining yearly QC and refund reports, KAKOBUY sellers transform raw data into strategic insights, fostering stronger, more reliable, and higher-quality supply chains.