As cross-border eCommerce continues to evolve in 2025, understanding logistics providers' customs clearance capabilities is crucial for businesses shipping between China, Europe, and North America. This analysis compares Pandabuy and CNFANS regarding their approaches to customs clearance under the latest regulations.
Customs Clearance Methodologies
Pandabuy's Approach
- Consolidated Clearance:
- Technology-Driven:
- EU-Adaptive:
- Bonded Warehouse Network:
- Technology-Driven:
CNFANS' Strategy
- Direct-to-Consumer Clearance:
- Local Agent Partnerships:
- North America Focus:
- Hybrid Solutions:
- Local Agent Partnerships:
2025 Customs Policy Updates
European Union Changes
- VAT collection now mandatory on all parcels (abolished €22 threshold)
- New sustainability tariff on non-recyclable packaging materials (+0.8%)
- EMCS-certified providers receive 10% filing fee reduction
North America Updates
- US De Minimis value raised to $1,200 through 2026
- Section 321 Pilot Program extension: expedited clearance for USMCA members
- Canada now requires E-Manifest submission 12 hours before departure
Side-by-Side Customs Performance
| Metric | Pandabuy | CNFANS |
|---|---|---|
| Average EU Clearance Speed | 1.7 days (IOSS) | 2.3 days (Post-Clearance VAT) |
| US De Minimis Success Rate | 89% | 93% |
| Seizure Rate (Regulated Goods) | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| DDP Service Availability | Premium Only | Standard for All |
With Europe's increased VAT controls and North America's trade facilitation measures, Pandabuy's technological approach proves superior for high-volume EU shipments, while CNFANS remains competitive for US/Canada routes. Both providers have adapted well to 2025's customs landscape, though their specialization areas differ significantly.